The promotion designed on sentiment
The scene
The planning meeting. Marketing proposes: "Let's do something for Saint Mary — customers love traditions, we differentiate from competition, let's go with 20% reduction on the category." Everyone approves. It seems logical, warm, good.
Two months later, the post-promotion report: sales +6%, but 80% of the growth comes from customers who would have bought at full price anyway. Cannibalization confirmed. Category margin: −14%. Net profit on promotion: negative. New customers attracted: 312, of which 89 returned only once. ROI calculated post-factum: −4.2%.
Nothing exploded. It doesn't appear on Facebook. The board doesn't ask questions — because sales grew, that was the declared target, that's what was achieved. But a month of work by 14 people, plus the communication budget, plus the sacrificed margin, plus the retail team's fatigue — all consumed for an illusory gain.
This is F5. The promotion wasn't designed wrong. It was designed without a project. With sentiment, with intuition, with "seems good" — on a data platform that existed, but wasn't consulted. Nobody asked "which customer segment has real propensity for this offer?". Nobody calculated "how many new customers do we need to compensate for cannibalization?". Nobody defined "what does, for this promotion, success mean?".
„Promotions designed on sentiment have high failure rates. You no longer start from zero, but from an analyzed segment profile." — Fundamental principle of Customers Equity / Promotion Design
How you detect it in your own organization
- The promotion decision starts from "let's do something for..." — not from "we have segment X with propensity Y for offer Z".
- The promotion mechanics (discount size, duration, mechanism) is chosen through internal compromise between marketing, commercial, and retail — not through numerical projection per segment.
- The success indicator announced before the promotion is "sales growth" — without distinguishing between real increment and cannibalization.
- The post-promotion report comes 30+ days after the end, when decisions for the next promotion have already been made.
- No post-promotion report from the last 2 years has stopped a similar next promotion — that is, organizational learning from F5 is zero.
The instruments that address it
F5 doesn't "resolve" with an instrument. It opens for analysis and disciplined design through a sequence:
- Customers Equity (S2). The mother instrument for F5. Maps the real value of each customer segment (frequency × margin × longevity × price elasticity). The output isn't a list of segments, but a propensity map — which segments have for concrete offer types. Without the map, the promotion is designed blind.
- Promotion Design (S4). Next step. Builds the mechanics of the promotion starting from the Customers Equity map — not from sentiment. The output includes scenarios with numerical projections of cannibalization, real increment, projected ROI.
- G-Score Calculator (S1). Filter step. The numerical profile of the designed promotion must pass the G-Score threshold before final approval. Functions as an anti-sentiment stop-gate.
- Promo ROI Intelligence (S9). Post-launch validation step. Recalculates real ROI (not gross revenue) and produces a documented post-mortem — so that learning enters the next design, not gets lost.
Recommended entry point: Recommended entry point: Customers Equity for a product category on which you plan 2–3 promotions in the next year. The output is a segment map with numerical propensities. The conversation with an OPS consultant starts from your real customer profile — not from the assumption that "customers love offers".
Re-anchoring note: The instruments above open the door to understanding fear F5. Solving it properly comes through an OPS consultancy intervention calibrated on what the instruments have evidenced. No instrument, alone, substitutes for the analysis and human decisions that follow.
Two gates. You choose.
Informal regime — alone, free
F5 doesn't have a dedicated public gate instrument (Customers Equity and Promotion Design are available only in consultancy regime — they require access to your data and calibration). But starting a conversation with us, before contracting, is simple: you tell us what category you're planning, you receive a short and free evaluation of how we would design the propensity map.
Talk to usConsultancy regime — with us alongside
The "Customers Equity Mapping + Promotion Design for a category" package is the natural gate: 6–8 weeks, propensity map per segments, promotional redesign for the next 3–4 campaigns per category. The output is ready for board approval, not for internal report.
Talk to usF5 does not live alone
- F2 — Margin erosion — F5 is the hidden cause of F2. If promotions are designed on sentiment, margin erosion is inevitable. F2 is the report, F5 is the mechanism that produces it.
- F1 — The invisible customer crisis — F5 alienates the valuable customer segment through a "for everyone" promotion that doesn't speak to it. F1 appears 4–8 weeks later, when the key segment starts moving its basket.
- F8 — Ad-hoc processes — F5 is the chronic form of F8 in the promotional area. Promotions designed on sentiment are the definition of ad-hoc processes — they depend on who's present at the meeting, not on a written methodology.